Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

858 S.W.2d 874

Cantrell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 1993

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1993-08-17

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1999

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-08-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Movant appeals from the dismissal, for untimely filing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). .

/858/sw2d/874 · .json · Public domain