In Re Stephen C. Perry’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2011
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart · Will v. United States · Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart · La Buy v. Howes Leather Co. · Bridges v. State of California Times-Mirror Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“exceed[ed] the proper scope of [his] authority as to constitute a usurpation of power.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“exploiting the proceedings for [union] organiz[ing] purposes”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.