Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

859 F.2d 150

Docket No. 87-6665.

Massingale v. Samples

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted June 30, 1988. Decided Sept. 15, 1988.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-09-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1990

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Hoerner v. U.S. Veterans Admin.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1988-09-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Danny R. Massingale, appellant pro se.

Stephen Aubrey West, Office of United States Attorney, for appellee.

Before K.K. HALL, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Danny R. Massingale appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Massingale v. Samples, C/A No. 86-1198-HC (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/859/f2d/150 · .json · Public domain