Ross v. Global Marine, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
859 F.2d 336 · 1988
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2001
10 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Porzig v. Nolden · Wrenn v. Ohio Department of Mental Health · Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc. · Ward v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A notice of appeal filed before the disposition of [a motion for reconsideration] shall have no effect. A new notice of appeal must be filed within the prescribed time measured from the entry of the order disposing of the motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.