Brewster v. Beck’s Empirical Analysis
859 F.3d 1194 · 2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on United States v. Place · United States v. Jacobsen · Soldal v. Cook County · Manuel v. City of Joliet · Lee v. City of Chicago
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A seizure is justified under the Fourth Amendment only to the extent that the government's justification holds force. Thereafter, the government must cease the seizure or secure a new justification”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] seizure conducted without a warrant is per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment - subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The exigency that justified the seizure vanished once the vehicle arrived in impound and Brewster showed up with proof of ownership and a valid driver's license”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.