Jaquez v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
859 F.3d 258 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1186A (§ 216 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Rubin v. United States · Dada v. Mukasey · Alwyn Colin Griffiths v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“placed [offender] on probation for one year and mandated numerous conditions, including good behavior, full-time employment, and abstention from alcohol and drugs”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gonzalez v. Sessions“conditions of probation, backed by the specter of a suspended prison sentence, are most certainly a form of punishment or penalty”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gonzalez v. Sessions“some form of punishment, penalty, or restraint on ... alien's liberty”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gonzalez v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.