Weil v. Elliott’s Empirical Analysis
859 F.3d 812 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 350 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. · Kontrick v. Ryan · United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa · United States v. Brockamp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he time limit imposed by § 727(e)(1) is not a 'jurisdictional' constraint. It is an ordinary, run-of-the-mill statute of limitations, specifying the time in which a type of action must be filed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] non-jurisdictional time bar is an affirmative defense that may be forfeited if not timely raised”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.