Broderick v. Dellasandro’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2019
2 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Relies on Krasnov v. Dinan · State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Dyer · Whitelock v. Leatherman · Gilardi v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. · 169 F. Supp. 125 - Putterman v. Daveler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The notice of removal of a civil action or proceeding shall be filed within thirty days after the receipt by the defendant ... of a copy of the initial pleading setting forth the claim for relief upon which such action or proceeding is based .... If the case stated by the initial pleading is not removable, a notice of removal may be filed within thirty days after receipt by the defendant ... of a copy of an amended pleading, motion, order or other paper from which it may first be ascertained that the case is one which is or has become removable ....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“commence the running of the thirty day period once the defendant receives actual notice that the case has become removable, which may be communicated in a formal or informal manner.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If the case stated by the initial pleading is not removable - solely because the amount in controversy does not exceed the amount specified in section 1332(a), information relating to the amount in controversy in the record of- the State proceeding, or in responses to discovery, shall be treated as an ‘other paper’ under subsection (b)(3).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.