Davis v. Keyes’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

cited by 13 later decisions

states following

January 2004

most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)

Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc. · Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co. · Richardson v. Shaw · PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED v. Willard S. HARTMANN, Leona R. Hartmann, Appellants · Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, And

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“Explicit in the court of appeals ruhngs and findings in Roney and McCoy [1] is the conclusion that the six-year eligibility period operates as a statute of repose. Implicit in the ruling is the conclusion that fraudulent concealment is a condition which tolls the six-year eligibility period. The instruction provided to the district court by the court of appeals in McCoy is both explicit and unambiguous. If there is adequate proof of fraudulent concealment, defendants’ claims more than six years old may still be pursued in arbitration.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. McCoy · 886 F. Supp. 1342 - Ohio Co. v. Nemecek
“Sec. 15. No dispute, claim, or controversy shall be eligible for submission to arbitration under this Code where six (6) years have elapsed from the occurrence or event giving rise to the act or dispute, claim or controversy. This section shall not extend applicable statutes of limitations, nor shall it apply to any case which is directed to arbitration by a court of competent jurisdiction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 919 F. Supp. 1061 - Vestax Securities Corp. v. Desmond · 944 F. Supp. 625 - PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, INC. v. Mills
““... should the District Court find, applying the relevant State law, that Dean Witter or its agents succeeded in fraudulently concealing their alleged wrongs, then the claims potentially may still be pursued in arbitration.” McCoy, 995 F.2d at 651 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. McCoy · 894 F. Supp. 298 - First of Michigan Corp. v. Swick

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.