Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 859 N.E.2d 708 - Ware v. State

Ware v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Franks v. Delaware · United States v. Trujillo · Jones v. State · Washington v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because [the appellant] cites no separate argument specifically treating and analyzing a claim under the Indiana Constitution distinct from his Fourth Amendment analysis, we resolve his claim on the basis of federal constitutional doctrine only.”), trans. denied. 2 . The probable cause affidavit itself does not contain this information. As we have discussed in the past, “a probable cause affidavit must include all material facts,” including”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The typical formulation of [omitted] 'material' facts is that they cast doubt on the existence of probable cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “information that could conceivably affect a probable cause determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.