Determann v. Anser, Inc.

Kurt DETERMANN and Stanley Bach, Appellants, v. ANSER, INC., a Florida corporation, and Anser Therma Technologies, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 19, 2003.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-11-19

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 2004

3 state decisions

Relies on 833 So. 2d 832 - Enterprise Leasing Co. South Central, Inc. v. Hughes · 847 So. 2d 579 - BUDGET REN-A-CAR SYSTEMS, INC. v. Bennett

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-11-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1John J. Anastasio, Port St. Lucie, for appellants.

¶2Harold G. Melville, Fort Pierce, for appellees.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We affirm the trial court's order assessing attorney's fees against appellants pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes, as we find appellants' arguments to be without merit. To the extent appellants argue that chapter 99-225, which amended section 57.105, is unconstitutional as violative of the single subject rule, we align ourselves with the first and third districts, which have rejected similar arguments. See Budget Rent-A-Car Systems v. Eddie Bennett,847 So.2d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Hughes,833 So.2d 832 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

¶5AFFIRMED.

¶6STONE, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.