Bernard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 573 So. 2d 330 - State v. Hawthorne · Glaubius v. State · 347 So. 2d 1021 - Fresneda v. State · 520 So. 2d 276 - State v. Williams · Hercule v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“See Faulkner v. State, 582 So.2d 783 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (holding that defendant charged with dealing in stolen property consisting of one rifle could not be ordered to pay restitution for second, unrecovered rifle; loss of second rifle was not caused by charged offense); Noland [v. State], 734 So.2d 464, 466 [ (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) ] (stating that restitution cannot be ordered for a theft not encompassed within the charge contained in the information or for items outside the scope of the criminal prosecution).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Balogac v. State“In addition to any punishment, the court shall order the defendant to make restitution to the victim for: 1. Damage or loss caused directly or indirectly by the defendant’s offense; and 2. Damage or loss related to the defendant’s criminal episode.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Balogac v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.