859 So. 2d 821 - Freeman v. Philan’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2007
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 536 So. 2d 417 - Pareti v. Sentry Indem. Co. · 740 So. 2d 603 - Marcus v. Hanover Ins. Co., Inc. · Kelly v. Weil · Bumgardner v. Terra Nova Ins. Co. Ltd. · Crocker v. Roach
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Financial Impairment exclusion provision of the RLI policy does not apply in this case because liability attaches at the retained limit of zero and is not contingent on the insolvency of the underlying carrier.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Under the language of the RLI policy, RLI would be responsible for the loss in excess of the retained limit. The retained limit . . . is zero. Therefore, under . . . the limits of liability section for the RLI policy, RLI would be responsible for the ultimate net loss in excess of zero, which would cover the claim of [the plaintiff].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“RLI could have listed the retained limit as the amount of the underlying insurance carrier[,] as did the insurer in Kelly . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.