Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 859 SW2D 418 - Jordan v. State

Jordan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2017

6 state decisions

30199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 228th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · United States v. Cronic · Almanza v. State · United States v. Swanson · Arline v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is logical to conclude that trial counsel, faced with overwhelming evidence of [defendant]'s guilt, chose to placate the jurors rather than to possibly antagonize them with an impassioned, though weakly supported, plea for a verdict of not guilty.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.