Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 859 SW2D 451 - Stringfellow v. State

Stringfellow v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 338th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Rose v. State · Nunfio v. State · Lane v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It cannot accurately be predicted how the parole law and good conduct time might be applied to this defendant if he is sentenced to a term of imprisonment, because the application of these laws will depend on decisions made by prison and parole authorities. You may consider the existence of the parole law and good conduct time. However, you are not to consider the extent to which good conduct time may be awarded to or forfeited by this particular defendant. You are not to consider the manner in which the parole law may be applied to this particular defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is also possible that the length of time for which the defendant will be imprisoned might be reduced by the award of parole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.