Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 859 SW2D 526 - MacK v. State

MacK v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2013

16 state decisions

90199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 208th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Geesa v. State · Butler v. State · Bowden v. State · Fernandez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant contends that the testimony reflects appellant’s possession to be as consistent with personal use as with delivery. Even if the record supports conflicting inferences, we must “presume — even if it does not affirmatively appear in the record — that the trier of fact resolved any such conflict in favor of the prosecution, and must defer to that resolution.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.