Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 A2D 109 - Abramowitz v. Bryant

Abramowitz v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Shapiro v. Pennsylvania R. Co. · Fowel v. Wood · Mellon v. United States · Fulton R. Gordon, Inc. v. Schram

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court did not err in admitting parol evidence of the mistake in Form 20. This was a statutory cause of action in which the fact in issue was the rent ceiling, and Form 20 was collateral to that issue. Where a writing is collateral to the issue, and where it is . offered as evidence of some fact in issue, it may be varied by parol testimony. Fulton R. Gordon, Inc., v. Schram, D.C.Mun.App., 44 A.2d 662 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.