Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 Ariz. 263 - State v. Thelberg

State v. Thelberg’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 1970
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Forsstrom · 130 Cal. App. 584 - People v. Gianni · City of Pontiac v. Carter · Pima County v. De Concini · Grande v. Casson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court feels that the principal question to be decided in this case is whether or not the defendant-owners are entitled to damages for impairment of access, or, is impairment of access compensable. If such is not the case, the court finds that the defendants’ damages are in the sum of $18,500.00, but the court feels, after careful reading of the briefs, an impairment of access is compensable, and Defendants are damaged in the sum of $29,250.00”.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.