Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 ARK 469 - Slocum v. Slocum

Slocum v. Slocum’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
September 2004
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2004

12 state decisions

3019081910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Haley v. Haley · Plant v. Plant · Glenn v. Glenn · Fountain v. Fountain · Countz v. Countz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is recognized and permissible practice for the defendant to file a cross bill and ask independent relief in divorce suits. When he does so, his suit is as separate and distinct from that of his wife as if the wife had brought no suit, and the finding of the court should be upon each separately.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.