In Re Terracor’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation) (1991), In Re: Gordon Sel-Way, Inc.
2 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 1101 · 11 U.S.C. § 1112 · 11 U.S.C. § 1127 · 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 11 U.S.C. § 1142 · 11 U.S.C. § 1144 · 11 U.S.C. § 350
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Pennzoil Company v. Texaco Inc · Pacor Inc. v. Higgins · Bellotti v. Baird
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) The court may direct the debtor and any other necessary party to execute or deliver or to join in the execution or delivery of any instrument required to effect a transfer of property dealt with by a confirmed plan, and to perform any other act, including the satisfaction of any lien, that is necessary for the consummation of the plan.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“For the court to harbor doubts regarding the propriety of continuing this proceeding, pending the parties raising the abstention issue, would be inconsistent with judicial responsibility. Matters involving abstention come within the general context of subject matter jurisdiction. Questions involving subject matter jurisdiction may be asserted by any party at any time or raised by a court sua sponte.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(A) transfer of all or substantially all of the property proposed by the plan to be transferred; (B) assumption by the debtor or by the successor to the debtor under the plan of the business or of the management of all or substantially all of the property dealt with by the plan; and (C) commencement of distribution under the plan.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.