Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 BR 922 - In Re Structurlite Plastics Corp.

In Re Structurlite Plastics Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2019

1001988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 365 · 11 U.S.C. § 507 · 11 U.S.C. § 510 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco · Sloan v. Hicks · Continental Illinois Nat Bank Trust Co of Chicago v. Chicago R I & P Ry Co · Avis Rent A Car System, Inc. v. City of Chicago · McSurely v. McClellan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On the other hand, a per se rule proscribing the payment of pre-petition indebtedness may well be too inflexible to permit the effectuation of the rehabilitative purposes of the Code.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.