Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

86 Cal. 211

Flashner v. Waldron

California Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1890

California Supreme Court · decided 1890-10-25

<p>Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.</p> <p>The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.</p>

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1903

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1890-10-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Paterson, J.

¶1The court below granted a motion for nonsuit, and judgment followed for the defendant. The plaintiff took no exception to the ruling. It is claimed that no exception was necessary, but it has been several times decided that an error in granting a nonsuit is an error in law, and must be excepted to. It is unnecessary, therefore, for us to consider the argument of counsel for appellant in support of his contention that the order granting a nonsuit is an order “ finally determining the *212rights of the parties,” and “deemed to have been excepted to,” under section 647 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

¶3Works, J., and Fox, J., concurred.

/86/cal/211 · .json · Public domain