Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 CAL 633 - Going v. Dinwiddie

Going v. Dinwiddie’s Empirical Analysis

1890

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
6
states following
January 1970
most recently cited

1 district · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 1970 · most notably Wise v. Southern Pacific Co. (1963), 48 Cal. App. 2d 746 - Monahan v. Department of Water & Power (1941)

1 district · 27 state decisions

60189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reardon v. City of San Francisco · Turpen v. Booth · Downer v. Lent · Joyce v. McAvoy · Triscony v. Beasley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is clear that the acts complained of were done by the defendant in his official capacity as a judicial officer, and there is no averment, in terms, that said acts were without or in excess of his jurisdiction, nor are any facts averred from which such want of jurisdiction appears. And that a judicial officer is not liable for acts done in his official capacity and within his jurisdiction is as thoroughly established as any other principle of law. One of the best expositions of that principle is found in the opinion of Shaw, C. J., in Pratt v. Gardner, 2 Cush. (Mass.) 68, 48 Am. Dec. 652 . This court has also had frequent occasions to state the principle. Downer v. Lent, 6 Cal. 94 , 65 Am. Dec. 489 ; Turpen v. Booth, 56 Cal. 68 , 38 Am. Rep. 48 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.