Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 Cal. App. 459 - Moeller v. Packard

86 Cal. App. 459 - Moeller v. Packard’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
January 1976
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 1976 · most notably Raggio v. Mallory (1938), Union Bank v. Wendland (1976)

25 state decisions

100192719301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co. · Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co. · Hoy v. Tornich · Green v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co. · Zarzana v. Neve Drug Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Nor can this court, without arbitrarily exercising the power of review to which it is limited in instances such as this, hold, as a matter of law, unless the speed limit is specifically fixed by statute, or unless, in the absence of a provision of law specifically limiting the rate of speed at which an - automobile may be driven over the public highways, the evidence in a particular case unquestionably shows that the operator of the car has driven it at an outrageously high rate of speed over a highway where the intrinsic or other conditions of the thoroughfare render such speed abnormally dangerous to other persons traveling over such highway, that a particular rate of speed is unlawful per se or constitutes negligence on the part of the driver.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.