Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 Conn. 191 - State v. Hall

State v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
November 1995
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1995

7 state decisions

20191219201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hinman v. Taylor · Reynolds v. Howe · Atwater v. O'Reilly · Francis v. Lewis · Fenn v. Bancroft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To determine whether the case . . . was a criminal case, it is necessary to consider the nature of the [transgression] alleged, the purpose of the action, and the end and object of the statute upon which it is based, as well as the form of the complaint.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.