Endleman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
86 F. 456 · 1898
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1938
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Logan v. United States · Shively v. Bowlby · Durland v. United States · Leisy v. Hardin · Starr v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““By the constitution, as is now well settled, the United States bavins rightfully acquired the territories, and. being the only government which can impose laws upon them, have (he entire dominion and sovereignty, national and municipal, federal and state, over all the territories, so long as they remain in a territorial condition.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.