Cockrill v. Abeles’s Empirical Analysis
86 F. 505 · 1898
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 1972
8 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Briggs v. Spaulding · Kennedy v. Gibson · Sanger v. Upton · Delano v. Butler · Ryan v. Koch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Tlie most liberal view which may be fairly taken of the implied powers of national banks would not sustain their right to engage directly in a manufacturing or business enterprise under any circumstances; but, even if the power in question should be conceded to exist under certain conditions, the present ease was not one which warranted this exercise.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bailey v. Babcock
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.