Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 F.2d 412 - In re Ellis

In re Ellis’s Empirical Analysis

86 F.2d 412 · 1936

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
May 1981
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 1981 · most notably Ruschig, In re Boyce (1944)

1 federal appellate ·

150193619401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Wagenhorst · In re Cole · In re Becker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is nothing unusual, certainly, about an examiner changing his viewpoint as to the patentability of claims as the prosecution of a case progresses, and, so long as the rules of Patent Office practice are duly complied with, an applicant has no legal ground for complaint because of such change in view.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.