Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 F.2d 809 - La Fon v. Grimes

La Fon v. Grimes’s Empirical Analysis

86 F.2d 809 · 1936

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
June 1998
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 1998

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

501936194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sparks v. Taylor · Carl v. Settegast · Allen v. Garrison · Turner v. Cochran · Essex v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The principle upon which the doctrine of innocent purchaser for value rests, like equitable principles in general, is not a hard and fast rule of narrow application, but one to be liberally and equitably applied. Under it relief is denied to a purchaser without notice who has not paid value, on the ground that his equity arises, not out of his mere lack of notice, but out of injury to him, through an innocent change of position to his prejudice. It is therefore denied where the matter of the payment remains executory between purchaser and seller, and there is no irrevocable change of position. It is granted where either the buyer has paid the purchase price or has entered with third persons into a binding obligation with regard to it, whether the obligation arises out of the execution or the assumption of negotiable promissory notes, or other form of undertaking which the buyer is able to perform, and from which he cannot in law withdraw. McAnally v. Panther (Tex.Civ.App.) 26 S.W.2d 478 ; Essex v. Mitchell (Tex.Civ.App.) 183 S.W. 399 ; Tobin v. Benson (Tex.Civ.App.) 152 S.W. 642 ; Sparks v. Taylor, 99 Tex. 411 , 90 S.W. 485 , 6 L.R.A. (N.S.) 381; Clemmons v. McDowell (Tex.Civ.App.) 5 S.W.2d 224 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.