Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 F.2d 820 - Hall v. Johnston

Hall v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis

86 F.2d 820 · 1936

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
January 1964
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently January 1964 · most notably Bishop v. United States (1955), Wojculewicz v. Cummings (1956)

22 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

1601936194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stallings v. Splain · Archer v. Heath · Fenton v. Aderhold · Van Gorder v. Johnston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As against collateral attack, the judgment is valid unless the contrary appears in the record, and omission in the record of every step in the proceeding does not overcome the presumption of regularity and warrant release on a writ of habeas corpus.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.