Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 F.2d 862 - Heller Bros. v. Lind

Heller Bros. v. Lind’s Empirical Analysis

86 F.2d 862 · 1936

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 1968
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1968 · most notably Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. (1938), Federal Trade Commission v. Cinderella Career & Finishing Schools, Inc. (1968)

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

1501936194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 159 (§ 9 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on United States v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad · Federal Trade Commission v. Claire Furnace Co. · Dalton Adding Machine Company v. State Corporation Commission · Bradley Lumber Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · E. Griffiths Hughes, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “And, if the act should subsequently be held to be unconstitutional in a proper case, these losses will have to be borne without redress. But — as was said by Judge Sibley in a similar case in the Fifth Circuit — these things are incident to every sort of trial and are part of the social burden of living under government. They are not the irreparable damage as to which equity will interfere to prevent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.