United States v. Ray’s Empirical Analysis
86 F.2d 942 · 1936
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2008
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barber Asphalt Paving Co v. Standard Asphalt & Pubber Co · Fraina v. United States · Yep v. United States · Wolpa v. United States · United States v. Adamowicz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The appellate court may at any time, on five (5) days’ notice, entertain a motion by either party for the correction, amplification, or reduction of the record filed with the appellate court, and may issue such directions to the trial court, or trial judge, in relation thereto, as may be appropriate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ray v. United States“This appellant had four months and has offered insufficient excuses for his delinquency. The bill of exceptions was insufficient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ray v. United States“no longer act to put the evidence in narrative form”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ray v. United States
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.