Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 F.3d 564 - United States v. Chesney

United States v. Chesney’s Empirical Analysis

86 F.3d 564 · 1996

Citation profile

147
cited by 147 later decisions
1
states following
June 2026
most recently cited

91 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 147 later decisions — most recently June 2026 · most notably United States v. Tucker (1996), United States v. Rogers (1997)

91 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

6901996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Lopez · Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida · United States v. Bass · National League of Cities v. Usery · Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 147 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It shall be unlawful for any person ... to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce, or possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition; or to receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Lopez also did not disturb the Supreme Court's precedents which indicate that a firearm that has been transported at any time in interstate commerce has a sufficient effect on commerce to allow Congress to regulate the possession of that firearm pursuant to its Commerce Clause powers.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[r]equiring the government in each case to prove that a felon has possessed a firearm 'in or affecting commerce' ensures that the firearm possession in question affects interstate commerce and saves § 922(g) from the jurisdictional defect that doomed § 922(q).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.