United States v. Durham’s Empirical Analysis
86 F.3d 70 · 1996
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Securities & Exchange Commission v. Forex Asset Management LLC (2001), Securities and Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp Ltd H (2002)
10 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cunningham v. Brown · Rosenberg v. Collins · Wilson v. Wall · Ucc v. Securities and Exchange Commission · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Amx International Inc B
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a result of the merely fortuitous fact that the defrauders spent the money of the other victims first.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“use[ of] its discretion in a logical way to divide the money”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The ability to trace the seized funds ... is the result of the merely fortuitous fact that the defrauders spent the money of the other victims first. Allowing Clare-mont and Northernaire (third parties) to recover from the funds seized to the exclusion of the other victims under the tracing principle would be to elevate the position of those two victims on the basis of the actions of the defrauders.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.