Stone v. Farley’s Empirical Analysis
86 F.3d 712 · 1996
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Hardaway v. Young (2002), United States v. Doe (1998)
23 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Bruton v. United States · Teague v. Lane · Estelle v. McGuire · Stone v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we determine that even under the more expansive scope of review prior to the Act, [petitioner] was not entitled to federal habeas corpus relief.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[N]either federal statutory nor constitutional law requires that a juvenile's parents be notified prior to obtaining a confession.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hardaway v. Young
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.