Jones v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis
86 F.3d 823 · 1996
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Lowe v. Apfel (2000), Wagner v. Astrue (2007)
9 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Farrell v. Massachusetts · Browning v. Sullivan · Woolf v. Shalala · Robinson v. Sullivan · Cruse v. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. the claimant’s daily activities; 2. the duration, frequency, and intensity of the pain; 3. precipitating and aggravating factors; 4. dosage, effectiveness and side effects of medication; and 5. functional restrictions.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lewis v. Colvin · Dornack v. Apfel“1. The actual functional demands and job duties of a particular past relevant job; or 2. The functional demands and job duties of the occupation as generally required by employers throughout the national economy.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he mere fact that working may cause pain or discomfort does not mandate a finding of disability.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.