Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

86 F. App'x 569

Brown v. Scott

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided January 28, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-01-28

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2004

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2004-01-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Bobby Joe Brown appeals the district court’s orders and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, dismissing without prejudice Brown’s civil rights complaint and denying the motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Scott, No. CA-3-633-8-25 (D.S.C. Sept. 5 & Oct. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argu *570 merit because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED

/86/fappx/569 · .json · Public domain