Kling v. Harris Teeter, Inc.

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 10, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-02-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2016

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2004-02-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Christine Kling and Cynthia Kling appeal the magistrate judge’s order * granting summary judgment for Defendants in the Klings’ civil action. We have reviewed the briefs, the joint appendix, and the magistrate judge’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Kling v. Harris Teeter, Inc., No. CA-00-609-3 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED

¶3 This case was decided by a magistrate judge upon consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2000).