Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

86 F. App'x 772

United States v. Murillo

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 16, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-02-16

Relies on Anders v. California

Decided 2004-02-16

PER CURIAM. *

¶1 The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Soledad A. Murillo on direct appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Counsel’s motion to supplement the record on appeal with a letter from Murillo’s treating physician is GRANTED. Counsel’s motion to place the letter under seal is also GRANTED.

¶2 Murillo has not filed a response to counsel’s Anders brief. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

¶3 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

/86/fappx/772 · .json · Public domain