¶1 Cassius James Brown appeals the sentence he received in conjunction with his *780 guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of a substance containing cocaine. He asserts that the district court erred in sentencing him as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 because he had received misdemeanor sentences for his two state jail felony convictions pursuant to a Texas Penal Code provision. Because Brown’s guilty plea to a state jail felony exposed him to the possibility of a sentence of more than one year in prison, these convictions count as felonies under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 despite the fact that Brown received a misdemeanor sentence under Tex. Penal Code § 12.44(a). See United States v. Rivera-Perez, 322 F.3d 350, 352 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 2625, 156 L.Ed.2d 641 (2003). The judgment of the district court is thus AFFIRMED.
86 F. App'x 779
United States v. Brown
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided February 16, 2004
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-02-16
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2006
Applies TX PE § 12.44
Relies on Castro-Jimenez v. United States · United States v. Rivera-Perez
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2004-02-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →