Akin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1923
Citation profile
110 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 110 later decisions — most recently August 2000 · most notably 109 So. 2d 7 - Singer v. State (1959), 766 So. 2d 1010 - Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc. (2000)
110 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mitchum v. State · King v. State · Clinton v. State · Hall v. State · Schley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether requested or not, to check improper remarks of counsel to the jury, and to seek by proper instructions to the jury to remove any prejudicial effect they may be calculated to have against the opposite party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.