Stephan v. Hoffman’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2004
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 84 Cal. App. 516 - San Jose Hospital v. Etherton · 130 Cal. App. 2d 750 - Harden v. Skinner & Hammond · 155 Cal. App. 2d 660 - Chaffin Construction Co. v. Maleville Bros. · Barnett v. United Oil Co. · 167 Cal. App. 2d 218 - J. C. Millett Co. v. Latchford-Marble Glass Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When an issue is presented by affidavits or otherwise in opposition to the motion for change of venue and affidavits in support thereof, the granting or refusal of a change of venue under I.C. § 5-406, is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and an order changing the place of trial or refusing to change it will not be disturbed in the absence of a manifest abuse of that discretion: Shirley v. Nodine, 1 Idaho 696 ; Gibbert v. Washington Water Power Co., 19 Idaho 637 , 115 P. 924 ; Lessman v. Anschustigui, 37 Idaho 127 , 215 P. 460 ; Ondes v. Bunker Hill and Sullivan, etc., Co., 40 Idaho 186 , 232 P. 578 ; Spaulding v. Hoops, 49 Idaho 289 , 297 P. 947 ; Sweeney v. American Natl. Bank, 64 Idaho 695 , 136 P.2d 973 ; Moscow Vets Club v. Bishop, 69 Idaho 350 , 207 P.2d 503 ; Jarvis v. Hamilton, 73 Idaho 131 , 246 P.2d 216 , 33 A.L.R.2d 910 ; Annot., 74 A.L.R.2d 16 , § 4.” 86 Idaho at 309-310 , 386 P.2d at 59 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Robinson v. White
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.