Clear v. Marvin’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 1991
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Baldwin v. Ewing · Laidlaw v. Barker · Walker v. Distler · Wormward v. Taylor · Gardner v. Hobbs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * The rule would seem to be-that error is never presumed on appeal,, and since the appellate court need not: search the record for possible errors; the burden of showing it is on the party-asserting it, or as sometimes stated, the burden of showing error affirmatively is upon the appellant, (citing cases.)””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jordan v. Jordan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.