Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 KAN 1 - New v. Smith

New v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
4
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably Malone v. Young (1938), Herthel v. Barth (1938)

32 state decisions

8019111920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reynolds v. Stockton · Gille v. Emmons · St. Lawrence Co. v. Holt · Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Moffatt · Routh v. Board of County Commissioners

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A judgment entirely outside the issues in the case and upon a matter not submitted to the court for its determination, is a nullity; and may be vacated and set aside at any time upon motion of the defendant.” (Syl. ¶ 1.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.