Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 KAN 509 - Jordon v. Clark

Jordon v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on King v. Mollohan · Jack v. Hooker · Miller v. Edgerton · Solomon Solar Salt Co. v. Barber · Kurt v. Lanyon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The presumption is that different writings made by the same parties, on the same day, relating to the same subject-matter, and in the course of the same transaction, should be read together and construed as a single contract. Especially should they be regarded as parts of one transaction, where, as here, they refer to each other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.