Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 Md. App. 196 - Custer v. State

86 Md. App. 196 - Custer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Brady v. United States · Santobello v. New York · Mabry v. Johnson · Angrist v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Plea bargain” is ... a term of art that should be used with care and precision. In Gray v. State, 38 Md.App. 343, 356 [ 380 A.2d 1071 ] (1977), this Court, speaking through Judge Wilner, defined this term of art: “Traditionally, a ‘plea bargain’ or ‘plea agreement’ contemplates a conditional plea of guilty or nolo contendere to one or more pending charges, the condition usually being either the dismissal or lessening of other charges by one means or another, or some concession being made with respect to disposition, or both.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.