86 Md. App. 340 - Batson v. Shiflett’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 157 (§ 7 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114 · Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776 · Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25 · Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of Carpenters
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whether an administrative agency’s declaration should be given preclusive effect hinges on three factors: ‘(1) whether the [agency] was acting in a judicial capacity; (2) whether the issue presented to the district court was actually litigated before the [agency]; and (3) whether its resolution was necessary to the [agency’s] decision.’ ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.