Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 Md. App. 560 - State v. Torres

86 Md. App. 560 - State v. Torres’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2018

16 state decisions

80199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Fay v. Noia · Booth v. Maryland · Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Bouknight · Curtis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In summary, when an allegation of error is raised in a post conviction case, the judge deciding the case should consider whether the allegation could have been raised before. If it could, the judge must then decide whether the allegation has been waived. In order to make this decision, he must first determine whether the allegation is premised upon a fundamental right or a non-fundamental right. If the right is a fundamental right, waiver, measured by the “intelligent and knowing” standard, must be proved. If the right is a non-fundamental right, however, the “intelligent and knowing” standard does not apply, and waiver is determined by general legal principles. The most significant of these principles is that the failure to exercise a prior opportunity to raise an allega tion of error generally effects a waiver of the right to raise the matter at a later time.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.