¶1This action was brought to recover damages for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment.
¶2Defendant was the international president of the Firemen’s Union. In December, 1911, during an election in local Union No. 56, a circular was printed and signed anonymously by several members of local Union No. 56 charging defendant and another officer of the union with being grafters. The circular was grossly libelous; an investigation was ordered and from twenty to twenty-five members of the union informed defendant that plaintiff had handed them the libelous circulars. Defendant also traced plaintiff’s responsibility through the printer who printed the circulars. Upon this information defendant prosecuted plaintiff for criminal libel. Plaintiff was held by a city magistrate, but was not indicted by the grand jury.
¶3On the trial five disinterested members of the union, Christopher Hurley, Michael Cox, John E. Kennedy, Thomas Flynn and Matthew McKinley, testified that *18they either received prints of the libelous circular from plaintiff or else that they saw plaintiff hand prints of it to other members of the union. This was denied by plaintiff.
¶4The evidence shows that defendant did not make complaint against plaintiff until after he had made a thorough and careful investigation of the reports that had been made to him as president, by a large number of members of the union, that plaintiff was circulating libelous matter concerning him and another officer, and after he had sought and received the advice of competent counsel that it was his duty to prosecute. In the light of these facts, conclusively established by the weight of evidence, it cannot be held that there was want of probable cause, which is essential to the maintenance of plaintiff’s cause of action. Rawson v. Leggett, 184 N. Y. 504, 509-512; Willard v. Holmes, Booth & Haydens, 142 id. 492, 502-505; Hobson v. Koch, 115 App. Div. 299, 302, 303; Freer v. Schmitt, 116 id. 462, 467, 468; Schmidt v. Medical Soc., 142 id. 635, 638, 639; Giorgio v. Batterman, 134 id. 139, 140; Shappee v. Curtis, 142 id. 155, 158; McCarthy v. Barrett, 144 id. 727, 729-732; Davenport v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 149 id. 432, 436; Galley v. Brennan, 156 id. 443, 445, 446.
¶5The holding of plaintiff, after an examination by a city magistrate, was prima facie proof of probable cause. Schultz v. Greenwood Cemetery Assn., 190 N. Y. 276, 280, 281; Crescent Live Stock Co. v. Butchers Union, 120 U. S. 141, 149-151; Burt v. Smith, 181 N. Y. 1, 5, 6-8.
¶6Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.
¶7Bijur and Pendleton, JJ., concur.
¶8Judgment reversed, with costs.