Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 NC 198 - Sutton v. . Schonwald

Sutton v. . Schonwald’s Empirical Analysis

1882

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

1 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2019

1 district · 10 state decisions

3018821890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The title acquired at a decretal sale of land made by the court in the exercise of competent jurisdiction is not rendered invalid by the reversal of the decree for mere irregularity or errors. This, too, although the purchaser was a party to the suit in which the decree was made. Nor, if notice be given to the purchaser at the time of the sale, and before he purchased, that an effort would be made to reverse the decree.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In which it was held that a court of equity, as the guardian of infants, had full power in its discretion to authorize or confirm a private sale of lands belonging to such a person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.